Legal Opinion

Stouts Mountain Coal Co. v. Grubb

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1928No. 6 Div. 780PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There was no evidence in the case connecting defendant with the institution of the prosecution, and the motion to exclude plaintiff's evidence was erroneously overruled. Boshell v. Cunningham, 200 Ala. 579, 76 So. 937. The portion of the oral charge excepted to was erroneous. Standard Oil Co. v. Davis,208 Ala. 565, 94 So. 754; Fowlkes v. Lewis, 10 Ala. App. 543,65 So. 724; Piggly-Wiggly Co. v. Rickles, 212 Ala. 585,103 So. 860; Brown v. Selfridge, 224 U.S. 189; 32 S.Ct. 444,56 L.Ed. 727. Defendant's requested charges correctly state the law, and should have been given. The verdict was opposed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Gulsby v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Brown v. SelfridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Hanchey v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McMullen v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Gulf States Paper Corp. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Brackin v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Caldwell v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Glidden Co. v. LaneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API