Stouts Mountain Coal Co. v. Grubb
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
There was no evidence in the case connecting defendant with the institution of the prosecution, and the motion to exclude plaintiff's evidence was erroneously overruled. Boshell v. Cunningham, 200 Ala. 579, 76 So. 937. The portion of the oral charge excepted to was erroneous. Standard Oil Co. v. Davis,208 Ala. 565, 94 So. 754; Fowlkes v. Lewis, 10 Ala. App. 543,65 So. 724; Piggly-Wiggly Co. v. Rickles, 212 Ala. 585,103 So. 860; Brown v. Selfridge, 224 U.S. 189; 32 S.Ct. 444,56 L.Ed. 727. Defendant's requested charges correctly state the law, and should have been given. The verdict was opposed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Standard Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Gulsby v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Brown v. SelfridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hanchey v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McMullen v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Gulf States Paper Corp. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Brackin v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Caldwell v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Glidden Co. v. LaneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.