Legal Opinion
Maryland v. Universal Elections
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 25, 2011No. Civil Action CCB-10-3183PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge.
The State of Maryland has brought this enforcement action against Universal Elections, Inc., Julius Henson, and Rhonda Russell, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., in connection with 112,000 anonymous prerecorded telephone calls made to Maryland residents on Election Day, November 2, 2010. Pending before this court is a motion to dismiss filed by the defendants. The issues in this case have been fully briefed and no oral argument is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2010). For the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fontell v. HassettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Ott v. Mortgage Investors Corp. of Ohio, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Ashland Hospital Corp. v. Service Employees International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Maryland v. Universal Elections, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Ashland Hospital Corp. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 575District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.