Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Bowers

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 29, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaulkner, J.

In June, 1943, the landlord, after having complied with the provisions of the Rent Regulation for Housing *685(8 Fed. Beg. 14663, as amd.), instituted a summary proceeding to recover possession of the premises involved, upon a ground specified by paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of such Regulation (8 Fed. Reg. 14667), i.e., the commission of a nuisance by the tenant in that he harbored a dog therein which considerably annoyed other tenants in the dwelling. Before the proceeding was heard, the parties, represented by competent counsel, entered 'into a stipulation terminating the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Morse v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lovett v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Holbert v. HarriganCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  3. Lovett v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Rosmor Realty Corp. v. CavinessCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  5. Schiller v. GrantCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API