Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Malloy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1938PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Per curiam

While we do not feel that the executor was guilty of any intentional wrong, we are in accord with the conclusion reached by the Appellate Division in this case and would be content to affirm without opinion were it not for the fact that a question has been raised as to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to grant the judgment which was granted.

The Supreme Court is a court of general jurisdiction. It may take the account of a trustee, probate a will, and exercise jurisdiction in many other mattérs where the Surrogate’s Court also has jurisdiction. The Legislature cannot by statute deprive it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Matter of of N.Y., L. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Ladenburg v. Commercial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Barone v. Aetna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Barker v. Cunard S. S. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. People v. CorreaNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Rochelle S. Moser v. Anne Sisko Pollin, Irvin Pollin, Hyman Sisko, and George M. CerroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Nishman v. De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API