Legal Opinion

Haddock v. . Stocks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Special proceeding for partition of the lands of Martha Louisa Cox, tried in the Superior Court upon these issues.(71) 1. Was Henry Haddock, the father of the defendant Nonie Stocks, born out of lawful wedlock? Answer: No.

2. If so, did Martha Louisa Cox, the testatrix, in her lifetime, acknowledge and recognize Henry Haddock as the son of William Haddock, and did she recognize and treat him as her kinsman, and acknowledge the relationship as his aunt and he her nephew? Answer: ..........

His Honor rendered judgment "that Henry Haddock was the lawful child of William Haddock, mentioned in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Brittain v. . MullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. McKesson v. . MendenhallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  5. Steeley v. Dare Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Carolina Mineral Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Kayann Properties, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Hyman v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API