Legal Opinion
Bloomfield Financial Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. National Home Life Assurance Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1984No. 82-1316, 82-1326PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity case an insurance sales agent, Bloomfield Financial Corporation (BFC), sued for breach of its agency contract with National Home Life Assurance Company (NHL). BFC claimed that NHL (1) failed to honor its agreement to pay BFC commissions equal to the highest percentage commission of any agency doing business with NHL, (2) breached its implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, and (3) unilaterally terminated the contract after notifying BFC that it would no longer distribute its policies through personal producing agents. BFC sought damages for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Photovest Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Mile High Fence Co. v. RadovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Towns v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dodd Insurance Services, Inc. And Tom Dodd, Jr. v. Royal Insurance Company of America, an Illinois Corporation F/k/a Royal-Globe Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hiatt v. SchreiberDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Chapman v. American Cablevision of Pennsylvania, Inc. (In Re Chapman)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Ervin v. Amoco Oil Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gilmore v. Ute City Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.