Legal Opinion

Towns v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 12, 1978No. C-1290PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle

This case raises the issue of whether Colorado should adopt or reaffirm the so-called impact requirement in cases of negligently inflicted emotional distress where that distress has resulted in serious physical manifestations. The district court dismissed plaintiffs action for failure to prove any physical injury or impact sustained at the scene of the accident. The court of appeals affirmed. 39 Colo. App. 332, 567 P.2d 814 (1977). We reverse.

On July 5, 1974, the home in which plaintiff lived with his family was destroyed by an explosion and fire. At the time, plaintiff was eleven years old.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hall v. JacksonColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Towns v. AndersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API