Legal Opinion

Chalmers & Williams v. Surprise

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1919No. 9,820PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Lake Superior Court; Walter T. Hardy, J udge. Intervening petition in receivership proceedings by Chalmers and Williams, a corporation, against Charles L. Surprise, receiver of the Midland Recoveries Company. From a judgment for the receiver, the petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, C. J.

The record in this case discloses that the Midland Recoveries Company, a corporation, was engaged in business at Hammond, Indiana; that, having become insolvent, the appellee, Charles L. Surprise, was appointed a receiver thereof by the Lake Superior Court; that said receiver duly qualified and assumed the duties of his trust, by taking into his possession the assets of said company; that among said assets was certain machinery which appellant *648claimed was its property, and, after making demand therefor, filed its intervening petition, in which it asked the court to require said receiver to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bishop v. RedmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Cable Co. v. McElhoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Swain v. SchildIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Homer v. GuzulaitisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock of IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1963
  3. Igleheart Bros., Inc. v. John Deere Plow Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Fletcher American National Bank v. McDermidIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. HolleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API