Legal Opinion

People v. O'Shaughnessy

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1933No. Docket No. 256PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant, having been convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property,' has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

It appears from the evidence that a store in San Diego was broken into on the night of May 29, 1933, or the early morning of May 30, and that a number of radios were stolen therefrom. On June 1, 1933, police officers found two of these radios in a house occupied by a Miss Johnson and a Miss Van Norton. On June 2d, the appellant was arrested and at police headquarters was asked “what explanation he had to make regarding the two radios which he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. People v. NooneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. LinderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. FegelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API