Legal Opinion
Drankwater v. Miller
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 30, 1993No. 92 Civ. 6212 (SWK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
In this diversity action involving claims of tortious interference with a contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress and unlawful discrimination under § 296 of the New York Human Rights Law, defendants Arnold Miller (“Miller”) 1 and Matrix Essentials, Inc., (“Matrix”) (collectively “defendants”) move, pursuant to Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff Wendy Drankwater (“Drankwater”) failed to join an indispensable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nasser Jaser v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association and Adriano FernandesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Associated Dry Goods Corporation v. Towers Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Carol H. Pulitzer-Polster v. Samuel C. PulitzerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Bodner v. Banque ParibasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Official Committee of Unsecured, Creditors v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In Re M. Fabrikant & Sons, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Lloyd's American Trust Fund LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.