Legal Opinion

History Co. v. Dougherty

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1892No. Civil No. 279PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. James W. Wright, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. ■

1Opinion of the CourtKibbey, J.

This was a suit in the court below upon an alleged contract of purchase by the appellee from the appellant of a complete set of the literary works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, then in the course of publication by appellant. The price alleged to have been agreed upon, and which was sued for in this suit, was $170.50. There was judgment for the appellee in the court below.

It is objected to our consideration of this appeal that this court has not jurisdiction, because the judgment appealed from is not one from which an appeal is allowed, in that the “matter in dispute.” does not exceed two hundred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conant v. ConantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Ex Parte LothropSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Carroll v. ByersArizona Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Spicer v. SimmsArizona Supreme Court · 1899
  4. De Hansen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District of the TerritoryArizona Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bogan v. PignataroArizona Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API