Legal Opinion

Spicer v. Simms

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1899No. Civil No. 670PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. ■Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDayis, J.

On April 2, 1898, the court below rendered a judgment and decree in this cause in favor of the appellant, the plaintiff therein. A motion for a new trial was not filed until three days thereafter. On July 2, 1898, and at the same term of the district court, the motion was granted and the judgment set aside. Subsequently, on appellees’ motion, an attachment which had been issued in appellant’s behalf, was dissolved. The appeal is taken from the order of the district court granting a new trial, and also from the order dissolving the attachment. Our jurisdiction to review the case is challenged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hume v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Trullenger v. ToddOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  4. History Co. v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Wells v. MelvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. James v. AppelSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Paine v. Copper Belle Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Svea Insurance v. McFarlandArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Levy ex rel. Levy v. StofellaArizona Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API