Legal Opinion

Florence Rumsey v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 5, 1969No. 17103PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HASTIE, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff in this negligence case was a shopper in one of the defendant’s stores when she slipped, fell and sustained the injuries for which she is suing. The accident occurred in Pennsylvania and the case is in federal court solely under diversity jurisdiction.

After the trial judge had denied a defense motion for a directed verdict, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $20,000. However, on an appropriate post-judgment motion, the court set aside the verdict and entered judgment for the defendant. This appeal followed.

We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Jones v. TreegoobSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Mack v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Forcier v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  4. Kenrick David v. Pueblo Supermarket Of St. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Saldana v. Kmart Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API