Legal Opinion
Jewel Tea Co. v. Board of Pharmacy
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1953No. Docket Nos. 13, 14, Calendar Nos. 45,372, 45,373PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.
These cases, involving similar issues, were tried together and consolidated on appeal. The principal issue is the applicability of PA 1923, No 85, as amended (CL 1948, § 446.301 et seq. [Stat Ann § 19.611 et seq.]). If the act is applicable, the secondary questions are whether it contravenes certain sections of the Constitution of the State of Michigan and is contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. This act reads:
“Sec. 1. Any itinerant or traveling vendor or hawker of any drug, nostrum, face powder, face cream, face bleach, face lotion, cosmetic, tooth powder, tooth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boyer-Campbell Co. v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Cook Coffee Co. v. Village of FlushingMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- People v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Mt. Sterling v. Donaldson Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chou v. HilgersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Excelsior Baking Co. v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Colonial Baking Co. v. Village of SpartaMichigan Supreme Court · 1962