Legal Opinion

City of Evansville v. Morris

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9573PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

This action was brought by the appellant upon the official bond executed to it by William G. Whittlesey, as secretary of the water-works of the city, and by David Elkins- and Frank Morris as his sureties. The condition of the bond was that Whittlesey should pay over to the city all sums of money that should come into his hands as such secretary, and the breach assigned was that after its execution, and after he had entered upon the discharge of his duties, ho received, as: such secretary, the sum of $723.04 from various persons, and, although said sum had been demanded of him and his…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Deardorff v. ForesmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  3. Adams v. GaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  4. Cranson v. GossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Lyon v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Clarke Auto Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Weinsklar Realty Co. v. DooleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Conrad v. KinzieIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. SternburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API