Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Kinzie

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1886No. 10,996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Howk, J. —

This was a suit by the appellee, Sarah Kinzie, against the appellant, Conrad, and one John M. Smith. Appellee’s complaint counted upon a promissory note for $134.58, executed by appellant and his co-defendant Smith, dated January 25th, 1879, and payable one day after date to appellee, by her then name of Sarah Skinner. Defendant Smith was defaulted and disappeared from the case. Appellant separately answered in six paragraphs, of which the first was a general denial of the complaint, and each of .the other paragraphs stated a special defence. Appellee replied by a general denial.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Kuhns v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. City of Evansville v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harding v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Newport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bender v. BuehrerLucas Circuit Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API