Legal Opinion

State v. Rowland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1981No. 819SC388PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the court’s failure to grant his timely motions as of nonsuit. G.S. § 14-33 in pertinent part provides:(b) Unless his conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing greater punishment, any person who commits any assault, assault and battery, or affray is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, imprisonment for not more .than two years, or both such fine and imprisonment if, in the course of the assault, assault and battery, or affray, he:(4) Assaults a law-enforcement officer . . . while the officer ... is discharging or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. SneadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. Powell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. State v. MayberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Glenn-Robinson v. AckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. CebuharNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. HaynesworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API