Legal Opinion

State v. Atwood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1976No. 21PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant’s appeal presents the following question:

1. Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in denying defendant’s motion for nonsuit?

The only motion for dismissal made by defendant was at the close of the State’s evidence. By introducing evidence, she waived this motion. G.S. 15-173. In a criminal case, however, on appeal the court reviews the sufficiency of all the evidence to sustain the verdict, notwithstanding defendant failed to move for nonsuit at the conclusion of all the evidence. G.S. 15-173.1. State v. Rigsbee, 285 N.C. 708, 208 S.E. 2d 656 (1974).

*270Defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. LeshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. State v. McCraineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jolly v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API