State v. Atwood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant’s appeal presents the following question:
1. Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in denying defendant’s motion for nonsuit?
The only motion for dismissal made by defendant was at the close of the State’s evidence. By introducing evidence, she waived this motion. G.S. 15-173. In a criminal case, however, on appeal the court reviews the sufficiency of all the evidence to sustain the verdict, notwithstanding defendant failed to move for nonsuit at the conclusion of all the evidence. G.S. 15-173.1. State v. Rigsbee, 285 N.C. 708, 208 S.E. 2d 656 (1974).
*270Defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. LeshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- State v. McCraineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Jolly v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.