Johnson v. McLamb
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
At the time of the tax foreclosure, Mary Mc-Lamb owned only a one-ninth undivided interest in the lot. She alone was joined as a defendant. The single question here presented is whether the tax foreclosure deed is color of title against the cotenants who were not parties to the foreclosure.
The deed meets all the essential requirements prescribed by the general rules definitive of colorable title. Says Walker, J., in Burns v. Stewart, 162 N.C. 360, 365, 78 S.E. 321, 323: “Color of title has been variously defined by the courts of this country. It was early held to be any writing which on its…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hicks v. . BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Perry v. BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Perry v. . BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Price v. Tomrich CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Nelson v. Layne Stuart Davis & Mary Jo Davis of the Layne Stuart Davis & Mary Jo Davis Revocable Trust Dated 8-2-2011Montana Supreme Court · 2018
- Yow v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Sweeten v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.