Yow v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Plaintiff has two assignments of error: First. The court erred in holding that defendant had offered evidence sufficient to establish good title to the property sold plaintiff. Plaintiff takes the position .that the .burden of establishing title was on the defendants. No matter what the law may have been prior to the adoption of the Code of Civil Procedure and our registration statutes (See 14 Am. Jur. 566 and cases cited' in note 8), it is now settled that when plaintiff alleges a breach of a covenant of seizin and the allegation is denied, the burden rests on plaintiff .to establish his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Perry v. BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Williams v. RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Perry v. . BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Gibbs v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964