Russell v. Boston Wyman, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff appeals from the allowance of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s claim for the loss of his wife’s *1006society, consortium, companionship, and services. It is not disputed that the plaintiffs wife was an employee of the defendant, Boston Wyman, Inc., that she claimed and collected workers’ compensation benefits under G. L. c. 152 (1990 ed.), for an injury arising out of that employment, and that she did not preserve her rights at common law by giving notice to her employer as required by that statute. The trial judge dismissed the plaintiffs claim…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Bigaouette v. PauletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Rodgers v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- St. Germaine v. PendergastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Commissioner of Revenue v. DupeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Saab v. Massachusetts CVS Pharmacy, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Adams v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.