Legal Opinion
Maple Manor Hotel, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided November 28, 1975PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHRIVER, Presiding Judge.
OPINION
The Case
This is a suit to enjoin defendant from interfering with the ingress and egress to plaintiff’s property and for damages because of said interference by the closing of a street.
The case arose as a result of the action of the Metropolitan Council in enacting Bill No. 73-482 by which a portion of Surf Drive, a public street adjacent to plaintiff-appellant’s property, was abandoned.
The complaint, as originally filed, prayed for an injunction to restrain the enforcement of Bill No. 73 — 482 as being capricious and a manifest abuse of discretion by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hamilton County v. RapeTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Crouch v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- City of Cape Girardeau v. HunzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Anderson-Gregory Co. v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
- Chisholm & Moore Manufacturing Co. v. United States Canopy Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Grantham and Mann, Inc., D/B/A Grantham Safety Industries, Inc. v. American Safety Products, Inc., Sam Evans, Richard J. Althoff and James HunnekeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Moore Construction Co. v. Clarksville Department of ElectricityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Cummins v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Redbud Cooperative Corp. v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.