Legal Opinion
Cummings-Landau Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc. v. Alderman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 6, 1954No. 22969_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLAN, Circuit Judge.
The question before us is whether the District Court properly refused reclamation of certain laundry machinery sold by petitioner to the bankrupt under two written conditional sales contracts, entered into on August 19 and September 18, 1952, respectively, under each of which there was a due and unpaid balance. The District Court, confirming the Referee in Bankruptcy, denied reclamation on the ground that both contracts failed to satisfy the requirements of Section 6692, Conn.Gen.Stats., and hence were invalid as to the Trustee in Bankruptcy under Section 6694 of those…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Acceptance Corp. v. ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- C. I. T. Corporation v. MeyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Rhode Island Hospital National Bank v. LarsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Premium Commercial Corporation v. KasprzyckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Refrigeration Discount Corporation v. ChronisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Amity Dyeing & Finishing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Cummings-Landau Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc. v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954