Legal Opinion
Refrigeration Discount Corporation v. Chronis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 24, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
In its complaint, the plaintiff alleged that on March 17th, 1930, Henry Blatchley and Harry Martin, doing business as the Kelvinator of Waterbury, entered into an agreement of conditional sale with the defendant Chronis, which was annexed to and made a part of the complaint, whereby they agreed to place in his possession certain refrigerating equipment manufactured by the Kelvinator Corporation of Detroit, Michigan. It was further alleged that the agreement had been performed by the seller and assigned to the .plaintiff; and the plaintiff, as assignee, asked judgment for the return of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- New Haven Wire Co. CasesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- State Bank v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Bank of California v. DanamillerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rhode Island Hospital National Bank v. LarsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
- Cummings-Landau Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc. v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Cummings-Landau Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc. v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Cummings-Landau Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc. v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.