Artrip v. Crilley
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
NEARN, Presiding Judge, Western Section.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in a boundary line dispute.
Eight issues are suggested for our consideration by counsel for appellants. Three of these have to do with the record on appeal and it is conceded that if appellants cannot prevail on the “record” issues, the other issues are moot. Appellants cannot prevail on the “record” issues and the judgment below will be affirmed.
Present counsel for defendants-appellants did not represent them at trial. Defendants elected to defend pro se. A full trial was had and judgment rendered…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Bradshaw v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AucoinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- State v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- State v. HouslerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Barbara Lundell v. Lois HubbsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.