Hunt v. Cohen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court. Tulsa County: II. L. Standeven, Judge. Action by Eveljm Cohen against Daniel Hunt. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
This is a re-plevin action instituted by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover the possession of certain hair goods and damages for their wrongful detention. In the petition it is alleged that the plaintiff is the owner of the following goods and chattels and entitled to the immediate possession thereof, and it is further alleged that the defendant wrongfully detained in his possession from the plaintiff all of the aforesaid goods for a period of 57 days and deprived the plaintiff of the use and benefit thereof to her damage in the sum of $200.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of TecumsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ladd v. BrewerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Clark v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Weleetka Light & Water Co. v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Jackson v. GlazeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joy v. GiglioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Chilton v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Dolinsky v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- North Side Canal Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1926
- Simpson v. GearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986