Jackson v. Glaze
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Canadian Coioniy. Action in replevin brought by S. H. Glaze, in the district court of Canadian county, against Thomas R. Jackson, E. L. Gay, and H. H. Cook, to recover a stock of merchandise seized by Cook as the property of one Charles Bartley.
Read the full summary
Error from the District Court of Canadian Coioniy. Action in replevin brought by S. H. Glaze, in the district court of Canadian county, against Thomas R. Jackson, E. L. Gay, and H. H. Cook, to recover a stock of merchandise seized by Cook as the property of one Charles Bartley. Judgment in the lower court in favor of Glaze for the recovery of the possession of the property, finding the value thereof at $2,200.00 and damages for detention at $300.00. On behalf of defendants below the case is brought to this court. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dale, C. J.:
March 15, 1894, Samuel H. Glaze commenced an action in replevin in the district court of Canadian county, against Thomas R. Jackson, E. L. Gay and H. H. Cook, to recover possession of a stock of dry g'oods and notions. The case was tried by the court and resulted in a judgment for Glaze for the return of the property, or its value, $2,200.00, and$300.00 as damages for the unlawful detention of the same.
Briefly stated, it appears that on March 9, 1894, Glaze purchased from one Charles Bartley a stock of dry goods, notions, etc., for the sum…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shauer v. AltertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Holmberg v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Palmer v. MeinersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schilling v. CurranMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Hunt v. CohenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918