Legal Opinion

Lambros v. Coolahan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 18, 1945No. [Nos. 48 and 49, October Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.

In March, 1944, Lambros (appellant in No. 48, appellee in No. 49, defendant in both) conducted a restaurant and liquor business at the corner of Liberty Heights and Garrison Avenues. He advertised the business for sale. Coolahan (plaintiff and appellee in No. 48) is a lawyer and real estate broker. Crane (Crane & Crane, plaintiffs and appellants in No. 49) is a real estate broker. Coolahan had lived in the neighborhood, had been a customer of the store, knew Lambros by sight, but had had no real estate transactions with him. Crane had known Lambros for years, had done business with him and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schriver v. SchriverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Schmeizl v. SchmeizlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KuhlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Tellez v. Canton Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Crane v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Wills Ex Rel. Wills v. Townes Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Smith v. BranscomeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API