Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. LeBar

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 2004PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Dayton LeBar challenges pro se the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Compel Monroe County Clerk of Court (Clerk) and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC) to Return Monies Collected in Violation of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9728. He argues that the absence of any provision in his sentencing order imposing court costs precluded the Department of Corrections from deducting such costs from his inmate account. He also argues that the trial court lacked authority to issue an order putatively imposing, or recognizing the imposition of such costs more than two years after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Harding v. StickmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. LarsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. WaltersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Boyd v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LittleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. LiebenspergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Spotz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth Department of Corrections v. TateCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API