Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
In Admiralty. Libels in personam by the Morse Dry Dock & Repair Company against the United States as owner of the Princess Matoika, the Pocahontas, the Susquehanna, the Potomac, and the America.
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
May 28, 1920, the government and the United States Mail Steamship Company (hereafter called the steamship company) entered into an agreement by which the government contracted to deliver to the steamship company within one year certain named steamers which had been used as army transports. The agreement provided' that each steamer was to be delivered under the terms of a form of charter annexed, which required the steamship company to recondition the steamer at its own expense and to operate it as owner pro hac vice for the term of five years, with an option to purchase.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- New Bedford Dry Dock Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Blamberg Brothers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- The South CoastSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The OceanaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The HurricaneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
- The A. S. ShermanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1930
- Grays Harbor Stevedore Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1924
- The OlympiaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1932
- The Gul DjemalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1925