Legal Opinion
The Hurricane
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 7, 1924No. 243, 245, 247, 251, 269, and 293 of 1923, and No. 117 of 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The dredge Hurricane was attached at the instance of employees claiming wages as seamen, and a number of libelants claiming liens for supplies and repairs furnished and made to her and to her machinery in various amounts upon the alleged order's of the Canal Construction Company, a corporation alleged to be the owner. The Moore & McCormack Company, Inc., claiming as owner of the Hurricane, admitted by answer the admiralty jurisdiction of the court over the Hurricane, denied ownership in the Canal Construction Company, denied necessity for the supplies and repairs, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- New Bedford Dry Dock Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Saylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896
- McRae v. Bowers Dredging Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1898
- George Leary Const. Co. v. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Kibadeaux v. Standard Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- The Sea LarkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
- Tampa Ship Repair and Dry Dock Company, Inc. v. Esso Export CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Kane v. Motor Vessel LedaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.