Legal Opinion

Ferrostaal, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 5, 2000No. 99 Civ. 10497(AGS)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Ferrostaal, Inc. filed this action on October 13, 1999, seeking damages for defendant’s alleged failure to deliver a shipment of steel bars. Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”) 56 and plaintiffs cross-motion for transfer of venue to the Southern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is GRANTED and plaintiffs cross-motion is DENIED.

BACKGROUND 1

In June 1997, plaintiff sought to ship 26 bundles of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
Lawrence A. Mitchell, Jr. v. Washingtonville Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
Donald L. Cleveland Christa A. Cleveland v. Beltman North American Co., Inc. N. American Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Docket No. 04-4066-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. v. Clark EnterprisesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
In Re Basis Yield Alphs Fund (Master)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
Geron v. Peebler (In re Pali Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
Megna v. Biocomp Laboratories Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.