Legal Opinion
McKown v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 7, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-1204-TPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment (Doc. 7). Defendant argues that plaintiffs’ libel claim is barred by the statute of limitations and that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim under the Kansas Fair Credit Reporting Act, K.S.A. 50-701 et seq. The court has considered the briefs submitted by the parties and is prepared to rule.
The standards governing consideration of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted are clearly established.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- John A. Mitchell v. Bruce King, Governor of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Kelley v. RinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rezin v. Barr (In Re Barr)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Wiley v. Mason (In Re Wiley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Frank J. Schweihs v. Thomas Burdick, Charlene Mitchell, and Simon and Schuster, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- LaBarge v. City of ConcordiaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- Logan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.