Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Rinkle

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1976No. B-5494PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOUGHTY, Justice.

George W. Kelley, petitioner, sued Roy Rinkle, respondent, for damages caused by Rinkle’s filing of a report with Credit Bureau Services, Inc., which report stated that Kelley owed Rinkle $277.00 for medical and dental services rendered by Rinkle. Kelley alleged that the report was false and libelous and that Kelley did not owe Rinkle any money. The trial court granted Rinkle’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Kelley’s suit was filed more than one year after his cause of action accrued and was therefore barred by the statute of limitations. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kelley v. RinkleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Burns v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1990

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API