Legal Opinion

Slaughter v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 1940No. 5 Div. 314PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit was for personal injury and property damage. The complaint as amended charged simple, willful, wanton, intentional conduct and injury. Amended count three was for simple negligence and count four was for “willful, wanton or intentional conduct.”

Defendant’s plea was the general issue, set-off and recoupment, growing out of the same collision and injury as embraced in pleas two to five, inclusive.

Errors assigned challenge the action of the trial court in giving its oral charge to the jury to which exception was reserved.

Several applicable propositions of law have been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Tullis v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Morrison v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Dowdell v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Reynolds v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McGough Bakeries Corporation v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Dortch Baking Co. v. SchoelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Rogers v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API