Legal Opinion

Dortch Baking Co. v. Schoel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 1940No. 6 Div. 641PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal challenges the failure of the trial court to give several requested affirmative charges for the respective defendants indicated.

The question of fact presented by the general issue was as to the agency vel non of the driver of the car, one of the defendants — Thomas D. Mattison. The contention of the defendant was, and is, that he was not a servant or agent of the Dortch Baking Company, but an independent contractor.

The judgment was against the Dortch Baking Company and Fred Dortch and Thomas D. Mattison. The judgment being reduced in response to defendant’s, motion,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Tobler v. Pioneer Mining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Southern Apartments, Inc. v. EmmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. PeinhardtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. BARBER PURE MILK COMPANY v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Maya Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API