Legal Opinion
State v. Moore
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 2009No. 29A02-0811-CR-1039PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant/Intervenor Indiana Department of Correction ("DOC") questions the trial court's jurisdiction over this matter and argues that this case is not the proper venue for review of DOC's Sex Offender Management and Monitory Treatment Plan ("SOMM"). Appellee/Cross-Appel-lant Timothy Moore ("Moore") questions the application of the Indiana Trial Rules in this case. The State Public Defender and the Indiana Public Defender Council (collectively, "IPDC") have provided their "Brief of Amici Curiae" and urge this court to review SOMM.
We remand…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blanck v. Ind. Dep't of Corr.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Citizens National Bank of Evansville v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bleeke v. LemmonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Bleeke v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Frederick Holmes-Bey v. Keith ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Brian Andert v. State of Indiana and Bruce Lemmon, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- David Bleeke v. Bruce Lemmon, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction Thor R. Miller, as Chairman of the Indiana Parole BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.