Legal Opinion

Citizens National Bank of Evansville v. Foster

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1996No. 82S00-9408-CQ-760PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Today we revisit the constitutionality of statutes exempting a debtor's property from the pool of assets available to creditors. In Matter of Zumbrun 626 N.E.2d 452 (Ind.1993), we held that the Indiana Constitution requires that the legislature fashion such exemptions in reasonably tangible ways designed to balance the interests of debtors and lenders. This certified question involves application and re-examination of that decision.

I. History of the Case

On November 30, 1998, Carolyn J. Foster and her husband Roland B. Foster, Jr. voluntarily filed a petition for relief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Matter of ZumbrunIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. DarlingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Tabor v. Garvin (In Re Garvin)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Baldwin v. ReaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Indiana Wholesale Wine & Liquor Co. v. State Ex Rel. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cantrell v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API