Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wright

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

PANELLA, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Anthony Wright, appeals from the order entered on April 4, 2006, by the Honorable D. Webster Keogh, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which dismissed his motion for DNA testing filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). 1 For the reasons set forth below, we find that Wright’s confession to the murder, rape, and robbery of the victim has been finally litigated, found not to be coerced, and was knowingly and voluntarily given; as such, pursuant to Commonwealth v. Young, 873 A.2d 720 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 739, 891…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. HeilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Com. v. Harvin, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API