Legal Opinion

Haden v. Liberty Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1936No. 11270PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Chief Justice.

Por some reason the original petition was not specified in the bill of exceptions as material by the plaintiff in error, and on account of this the Supreme Court is not informed as to the. ground upon which the petitioner sought an injunction, since the court was not requested to transmit the petition to this court. The only designation by the plaintiff in the *210bill of exceptions is “the case of C. J. Haden v. Liberty Company, which was an application by the plaintiff for injunction against the defendant,” Certainly a statement of the case as made by the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. RooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Solomon v. PetersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  3. Cox v. MontfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. Banks v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Saffo v. FOXWORTHY, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Bibb County v. ElkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Harper v. Foxworthy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Southern Security Co. v. American Discount Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Latham v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API