Legal Opinion
Westman Commission Co. v. Hobart Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 28, 1982No. Civ. A. 76-K-918PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER.
KANE, District Judge.
In this antitrust case the plaintiff, West-man Commission Company, alleges that the defendant, Hobart Corporation, combined or conspired with a competitor of the plaintiff, Nobel, Incorporated to restrain trade in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. sec. 1. Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. sec. 15, authorizes this private action and provides this court with subject-matter jurisdiction.
Pursuant to the pre-trial order, trial of this case was bifurcated. After the first trial, which was held in 1978 and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westman Commission Company, Cross-Appellant v. Hobart International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Gorman v. University of Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
- Westman Commission Co. v. Hobart Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- Westman Commission Company, Cross-Appellant v. Hobart International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986