Legal Opinion

Alexander v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1939No. A-9426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

An information was filed in the district court of Creek county charging defendant with the crime of grand larceny. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to serve a term of one year in the penitentiary, and has appealed.

The first assignment of error is: “The trial court erred in the admission of incompetent and prejudicial testimony.” Under this assignment of error, many parts of the evidence are discussed. We have carefully read the record, and also the authorities cited, and do not find that any error occurred which would be prejudicial to the rights of this defendant. As a matter of fact,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanditen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Gracy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. State v. FraserOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Dickson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Land v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API