Legal Opinion
In re Bufalini
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 10, 2018No. 50785-4-IIPublished
1Opinion of the CourtBjorgen, J.
*264¶ 1 Paul Bufalini seeks relief from personal restraint following the Department of Correction's (DOC) revocation of his drug offender sentencing alternative (DOSA) sentence. He argues that (1) DOC violated his due process rights by failing to inform him that he had the right to have a request to be represented by counsel considered on a case-by-case basis at his urinalysis (UA) violation hearing, (2) DOC improperly applied RCW 9.94A.662(3), (3) his UA test was so unreliable that reliance on its results violates due process, (4) DOC's failure to preserve his UA test sample violates due…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Cascade District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.