Bromberg v. Gekoski
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
The wife plaintiff, a pedestrian, fell and was seriously injured when she stepped into a hole 1 located on a small strip of land running between the public sidewalk and the curbstone of the cartway. This action for damages followed and resulted in a jury verdict for the defendants. A motion for a new trial was denied. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered upon the verdict.
In charging the jury as to the duty of care required of a possessor of land in maintaining the sidewalks in front of his property, which are open for use by the traveling public, the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCracken v. Curwensville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Lawrence v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Schaut v. St. Marys' BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Silberman, Admr. v. DubinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kardibin v. Associated HardwareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Mull v. IckesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Butler v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.