Legal Opinion

Bromberg v. Gekoski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1963No. Appeal, 72PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

The wife plaintiff, a pedestrian, fell and was seriously injured when she stepped into a hole 1 located on a small strip of land running between the public sidewalk and the curbstone of the cartway. This action for damages followed and resulted in a jury verdict for the defendants. A motion for a new trial was denied. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered upon the verdict.

In charging the jury as to the duty of care required of a possessor of land in maintaining the sidewalks in front of his property, which are open for use by the traveling public, the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCracken v. Curwensville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Lawrence v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Schaut v. St. Marys' BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Silberman, Admr. v. DubinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Kardibin v. Associated HardwareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Mull v. IckesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Butler v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API