Legal Opinion

Harsin v. Pioneer Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1927No. 4796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff is owner of twenty acres of agricultural land within the Pioneer Irrigation District, and is entitled to water for its irrigation from what is known and designated as the Phyllis canal of that district, which water is diverted from this canal through certain laterals privately owned by plaintiff. Water for all of the farm, except approximately five acres, which is too high to be irrigated by gravity, is obtained through diversion works and a headgate in the side of the canal. For many years water for this high land was procured by means of a water-wheel, and through a different…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Bowman v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gyra v. WindlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Arthur Irrigation Co. v. StrayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Watkins v. Mountain Home Co-operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Checketts v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Eliopulos v. Kondo Farms, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Rentfro v. DettwilerMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ramseyer v. JamersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bradshaw v. Milner Low Lift Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API