Legal Opinion

Wheatley v. City of Fairfield

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1932No. 41039PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, C. J.

Before the trial of the consolidated causes, it was agreed that the court should rule on objections to testimony : that is, that the trial should proceed in accordance with the method of trial applicable to ordinary actions.

The appellant in its brief and argument makes n.o claim that the court erred in the equitable action, and under the Rules of this court, any error claimed to have been made by the court which is not argued in the argument in chief shall be deemed to have been waived. We will, therefore, proceed at once to determine the matters urged for reversal in the condemnation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bennett v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Kosters v. Sioux CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Kukkuk v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Wissmath Packing Co. v. Mississippi River Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Ferguson v. Firmenich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wheatley v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Fanning v. Mapco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Hammer v. County of IdaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Peterson v. Board of Trustees of Drainage District No. 5Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. City of Fairfield v. DashiellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API