Legal Opinion
Prime Rate Premium Fin. Corp., Inc. v. Karen Larson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 11, 2019No. 18-2071PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
After four years of perpetual delays, Prime Rate Premium Finance Corporation obtained a sixth trial date to vindicate its claims that Karen Larson and her late husband, Keith Larson, had bamboozled it out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Yet the day before trial, after red-flag warnings that the district court would entertain no further extensions, Larson moved for a continuance. Her last-minute motion came with an unsigned doctor's note, the letterhead of which did not match its signature block. Larson did not show up for trial the next day. The district court found…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Akno 1010 Market Street St. Louis Missouri LLC v. Nahid PourtaghiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Rhonda Stelly v. Paul DurisoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- NPF Franchising, LLC v. SY Dawgs, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Sunless, Inc. v. Palm Beach Tan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- 4U Promotions, Inc. v. 18001 Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.