Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of King

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1919No. Civ. No. 2910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITTAIN,

While Phebe R. King, aged eighty-three, was living with one of her sons, other children petitioned for the appointment of a guardian, alleging she was incompetent and subject to fraud, which they further alleged was being practiced upon her. The petition was denied. [1] The appeal was based wholly on the claimed insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings that she was not incompetent and that no fraud had been practiced. The evidence was conflicting and enough appeared to support the findings. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed. (Matter of Daniels, 140 Cal.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crossley v. ElielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In Re BraunsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1930
  3. In re the probate of the alleged will & Codicil of BraunsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API