Legal Opinion

Matter of Daniels

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1903No. S.F. No. 3267PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco appointing a guardian of an alleged incompetent person. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is a proceeding on petition of Margaret Halpin, instituted for the purpose of having a guardian appointed of the person and estate of Mary E. Daniels, alleged to be an incompetent person. The trial court found in favor of petitioner, and made an order appointing the Union Trust Company as such guardian. The contestant, Mrs. Daniels, appeals from the “minute-book order” appointing the guardian, and from “the judgment, or order, entitled 'findings and conclusions of law,’ ” appointing such guardian; and also from an order denying her motion for a new trial. Respondent contends that the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. In Re HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Carroll v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In Re DoreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1991
  5. Schwarz v. ThoresonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API