Legal Opinion

Crossley v. Eliel

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1934No. L. A. No. 14368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order declaring appellant “mentally incompetent and incapable of taking care of or managing her property”, and appointing a guardian of her estate, but not of her person. Since taking the appeal the ward has died. Respondent has filed herein a copy of the death certificate and suggests that the appeal be dismissed for the reason that the issue as to appellant’s competency became moot by her death.

Preliminarily, we do not hesitate to state that we have examined the appeal on its merits and find nothing suggesting a reversal of the order. However, the proceeding being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. In re FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. In Re Estate of KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minor v. LappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Orange County Social Services Agency v. Albert Z.California Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API